Approved
Minutes of the Budget Advisory Committee (BAC)
Town
of Temple, NH
March
26, 2003
Members present Public
present
(in
alphabetical order) Christine
Andersen
Steve
Andersen (ph 924-7661; 924 8544; f 924-2306) Joyce
Kullgren
Rae Barnhisel (ph/f 878-3671) Bruce
Kullgren, Jr.
Charlene
Eddy (ph 878-1589) Jennifer
Kullgren
Brian
Kullgren (ph 878-3935) Sherry
Fiske (select board
Chris
Nolte (ph 878-3064) Ted
Petro (select board)
Paul
Quinn (ph 924-6173) Debra
Harling (admin. asst.)
Meeting
called to order at 7:09 pm
Order
of Business:
1. Minutes: February 26, 2003, minutes approved.
2. Discussion with Select Board Members
T. Petro expressed his concern that
budgeting involved “policy” and that policy should be set by the Select Board.
He gave an example of police coverage on weekends. Barnhisel asked whether the
BAC might just focus on “process” and let the people decide on policy. Andersen
said the BAC would bring policy issues to Select Board, and if there was
disagreement, to poll the taxpayer. Quinn gave an example in which the Select
Board might, as policy, add 10% to the budget, and that the BAC would assess
that policy. He felt that the two bodies would work together but that policy
had not yet been articulated. S. Fiske said that the budget process has been
handed down orally without a policy put into writing. Kullgren said that, as a
past Select Board member, policy was often challenged by residents in town and
sometimes changed as a result. He felt SB-2 (Senate Bill 2) might be a good
thing for the town in 2 to 3 years. Barnhisel suggested that the BAC might be
changed to a full-fledged Budget Committee under 32:14. J. Kullgren provided
the information that 99 out of 261 towns in New Hampshire had Budget
Committees.
3. Elections and Logistics
The following members were nominated for
the following positions: Andersen for Chair, Kullgren for Vice-Chair, and
Barnhisel for Minute-Taker. Nominations were seconded and voted unanimously in
the affirmative. S. Fiske asked whether the BAC would prefer to have a paid
minute-taker brought in. The BAC voted in the negative (Barnhisel abstained).
Barnhisel asked for detailed feedback from other members on the minutes and
said her goal was to see them be shorter if possible. The BAC voted to meet
every 2nd and 4th Wed. from 7 pm to 9 pm. The meetings
will be held in the Municipal Building until April and then in the Town Hall
thereafter (beginning May 14). Barnhisel will prepare a submission for the
Temple Newsletter (May 1 deadline) to inform residents of the time and place.
4. Discussion on Taxpayer Involvement
The BAC agreed that holding meetings in
the Town Hall would encourage taxpayer participation in the process. Andersen
suggested polling taxpayers with post cards to get a feel for what the people
want to have happen. Nolte commented on the frustration of taxpayers in
participating. Quinn suggested using the local newspaper and newsletter to
advertise meetings and agendas and letting local reporters know of what the BAC
was doing. Andersen brought in a newsletter written by Greenfield’s BAC. Petro
suggested that BAC members should go door-to-door or stand at the store to meet
people and discuss issues. The BAC agreed to provide more detailed information
to the taxpayer in the Annual Town Report. Barnhisel read from DRA’s handout on
Chapter 32: Municipal Budget Law and cited 32:5, VII that mandates towns to
print the certified posted budget (MS-6) in the town report. She said that this
minimum requirement had not been met in the latest Town Report and suggested
that abatements be itemized.
5. Discussion on BAC Function
Barnhisel read the RSA that governs the
BAC, 32:24: Other Committees to underscore that the BAC appears to have the
latitude to function “as the municipality...sees fit...” and pointed that Chapter
32:11, I: Emergency Expenditures and Overexpenditures lays out a process for
special, unforeseen appropriations. Andersen raised the issue of whether using
the fund balance to offset increases in the tax rate was a prudent system. He
asked whether the town wanted Priority Spending or Overappropriating and
whether we would build a budget on what is appropriated or what is spent. It
was agreed that Barnhisel would contact Sandra Rourke and Beverly Jewell from
DRA to come in for another working session. J. Kullgren provided a copy of
Chapter 10, Budget and Finance Management, taken from the Handbook for Local
Officials (June 2001) to the BAC and copies were made for each member.
Barnhisel gave each new member a copy of the policy recommendations of last year’s
BAC and asked members to consider adopting (with amendments) their 3 goals.
Nolte asked that members be given time to digest the paperwork.
5. Interview with Administrative
Assistant, Debra Harling
D. Harling addressed questions that had
been raised in last year’s BAC minutes regarding whether the “green book,” a
Pay Classification by the NH Municipal Association, had been officially
adopted. She gave an adoption date of Feb. 2002 and explained that book
contains the recommendation for an annual pay raise of 3%. She reported that
department heads were now receiving a monthly statement of their portion of the
operating budget (i.e., Road Agent receives Hwy Dept. and Cemetery portions).
When asked about the status of the part-time employees, D. Harling replied that
record retention is still needed but that it is not likely to go past another
year. The office assistant position was a more permanent position that needed
evaluation. Certain tasks such as payroll and accounts payable needed better
coverage.
She addressed why spending in the fourth
quarter of the year seemed rapid and explained that some expenses are held off
until the end of year due to the possibility of an unforeseen emergency.
Andersen questioned the $4000 gravel purchase (trucking and material) in the
Cemetery category. Discussion on getting bids followed. Currently, there is no
policy and Dept. heads have leeway to find the best price. D. Harling said that
the Fire Engineers have a policy of getting a second opinion if the purchase
price is over $500. Discussion followed on whether the BAC is an appropriate
committee to evaluate bids. D. Harling suggested that certain investigative
work such a health insurance could be examined by the BAC.
D. Harling stated she would not start
working on the budget until after Sept. because of other obligations to DRA.
When asked by Kullgren to pick a date for Dept. heads to bring in their
budgets, Harling suggested the end of Sept. Andersen asked whether 2 copies of
the entire budget (categories and line item detail) could be provided to the
BAC each month. T. Petro suggested quarterly. Andersen suggested that monthly
can evolve to quarterly. It was agreed that D. Harling would provide the BAC
with 6 full copies quarterly and provide the Budget Report (categories only)
monthly. D. Harling agreed to provide the BAC the Account Detail (line item
detail) for a specific category if there was a question.
6. Members’ Comments
Quinn made the following requests: a) that
the BAC evaluate the information that Mason Klinck provided at the Town
Meeting, “Statistical Analysis...Comparative Town Spending, b) that all Dept.
heads be invited to the workshop session with Sandra Rourke, c) that the BAC
organize a workshop with Dept. heads to standardize procedures, and d) that the
BAC hold a formal meeting with the select Board in June.
Meeting adjourned at 9:13 pm
Respectfully
submitted,
Rae
Barnhisel
April
9, 2003